Podcast: AI Data Centers in Space

Posted on by onespaceman2000

If you are following the debate about whether data centers belong in orbit, this Freakonomics Radio podcast titled “Should A.I. Move to Space?” may be for you.

Guest host Steve Levitt talks to a number of experts about the role of AI in our economy. I recommend listing to all of the podcast since much of it touches on the logistics of data centers in orbit, but it is the later part of the podcast involving a discussion with Will Marshall, co-founder and C.E.O. of Planet Labs, that peaked my attention. He discusses both the role of Planet Labs as its satellites monitors every corner of the Earth’s surface as well as the need for AI data centers in space.

In terms of the Planet Lab satellites, I found his most intriguing statements were related to the reduced costs of satellites. While most of the stories in the press seem to be about the decrease in rocket costs, Mr. Marshall said the real transformation is the miniaturization of satellites. Even under the earlier rocket system (pre-SpaceX), the drop in satellite costs due to smaller satellites would have been incredible.

In the quote below, Mr. Marshall is referring initially to the lower rocket costs, but then he expands into the real cost saving:

But remember even a four or five x reduction in cost, which really helps the whole space industry and has helped spawn it, is less significant, purely from an economic standpoint, than the 100 to a 1,000x improvement in cost performance of satellites that are going in. So, in each kilogram that you put up into space, if you can get a hundred times more data, because you’ve made the satellite way smaller, then you have won big time, even if the launch cost didn’t change one iota.

In his discussion about AI data centers, Mr. Marshall also has a unique view about the role of the Earth’s surface versus space:

I think it’s inevitable that, within a 10-ish year timeframe, most computers being built on the Earth will be going to space. I actually think not only is it going to be economically cheaper, but it’s going to be more sustainable. Earth’s life is so precious, it’s incredible, but yet we’re whittling away a lot of it. We’re doing deforestation for lithium, for cows, for whatever, we’re doing it. And we need to put our energy-intensive infrastructure into orbit, if we can, to not have a collision course with the biodiversity on the planet,

The podcast episode is in two parts, so be sure to listen to the second part when it comes out.

Space Quote: Two Spacecraft Are Now Imperiled

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): Artist’s rendering of the LINK spacecraft in the Pegasus XL Rocket after launch. (Northrop Grumman)

“Over the weekend, Katalyst’s LINK servicing spacecraft experienced issues with attitude control, causing the spacecraft to spin and resulting in sporadic communications. Preliminary investigation shows that two of LINK’s three reaction wheels currently are not operable, and there is some loss of functionality in its cold gas thruster system. LINK is designed to approach, capture, and boost NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory to a higher orbital altitude.”

-Statement by NASA regarding the private sector LINK mission to save the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, which is slowly losing altitude and is expected to burn up in the atmosphere by year’s end if nothing is done. The LINK mission was launched from the Marshall Islands on July 3rd aboard a Pegasus rocket.

Space Stories: English Observatory Closing, an Early Warning System for Astronomers, and Accessing Europa’s Ocean

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): The Jodrell Bank Observatory in Cheshire, England. (Jodrell Bank)

Here are some recent space-related stories of interest.

—The Guardian: “Jodrell Bank Observatory Facing Closure After Major Funder Cuts Support“

Jodrell Bank Observatory, the hub of a world-leading network of radio telescopes, is facing closure after government funding for the facility was slashed. Scientists say decision is blow to UK astronomy as deep space observatory is home to world-leading facilities. The deep space observatory includes the Grade I-listed Lovell telescope and is prized by astronomers who study galaxies, black holes, star formation, planets beyond the solar system and the afterglow of the big bang.

—ZME Science: “Astronomers Are Building an ‘Artificial Retina’ to Protect Telescope Images From Satellites“

A telescope can spend hours collecting the faint light of a distant galaxy. A fast-moving satellite needs only a few seconds to cross its field of view, leaving a bright streak that contaminates (and sometimes ruins) the long exposure. As the number of satellites around Earth grows, astronomers increasingly need ways to predict and avoid these crossings. Researchers at the University of Warwick are now developing an early-warning system that could spot an approaching satellite and alert a telescope before it enters the image.

—Rutgers: “Why Europa’s Hidden Ocean May Be More Difficult to Reach Than Scientists Thought“

Europa, one of Jupiter’s icy moons, long has fascinated scientists because of what may lie beneath its frozen shell: a global ocean of liquid water. That hidden ocean has made Europa one of the most compelling places in the solar system to study the conditions that might support life. But new research led by Rutgers scientist Lujendra Ojha suggests one of the most promising shortcuts to Europa’s ocean may be far more complicated than previously thought.

Note: Here is the podcast version of this post.

Astronomy Question: The Durability of Apollo Remains

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): A close-up view of an astronaut’s bootprint in the lunar soil during the Apollo 11 mission. (NASA/Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin)

Multiple Choice: For how long will signs of the the earlier Apollo missions (e.g., footprints, equipment, flag, etc.) be visible on the Moon’s surface?

A. 1-10 million years
B. 10-100 million years
C. 100-500 million years
D. More than 500 million years

Take a guess and then check your answer by going to the “Astronomy Question Answer Sheet” page.

Starship’s 13th Test a Needed Success

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Credit: SpaceX

After some delays, SpaceX’s Starship rocket is back in testing mode, with yesterday’s 13th launch a success. The rocket met the milestones set for the mission, and even launched a batch of satellites. This should give SpaceX and NASA some breathing room, as well as the new investors in SpaceX.

Mr. Musk had a bad week with both Tesla and SpaceX stock struggling. While SpaceX stock fell approximately 7 percent during the five days preceding the launch, the market should be somewhat more confident on Monday morning following the successful test.

Reuters reported last week that short sellers betting against SpaceX are making a fortune to the tune of about $8.7 billion. Mr. Musk may not like this, but if you want to be part of the marketplace then you need to understand how the market works.

In stocks, what goes up can often come down, and it can be painful to watch. As a rocket man, Mr. Musk should be familiar with this.

Maybe his success with Starship on Friday will turn some of that around.