Podcast: You Can Provide Comments on Proposed Grant Rules Impacting NASA

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): Information from OMB’s “Learn About the Regulatory Process” page. (OMB)

As noted in a prior posting, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is politicizing the grant process for science, including space-related grants.

A recent episode of the Planetary Society’s Planetary Radio podcast covered this proposed change and suggested ways that all of us can push back on these changes.

For specific guidance on what you can do, this page from the Planetary Society provides useful instructions. As the site states:

The OMB proposal would allow political appointees to usurp agency autonomy and cancel any grant at any time if that person decides the work is no longer convenient. The proposed rules would make scientific peer review only advisory while political appointees decide what (and who) gets funded.

The site provides clear instructions to help you write at least two paragraphs that can then be used to challenge this proposed policy. In this case, form letters are not helpful because they would be grouped together as one comment.

The American Astronomical Society has its own page explaining how you can respond to this particular OMB proposal.

And remember, if you want to submit comments but remain anonymous rather that providing all of your personal details to OMB or even the Planetary Society, you are allowed to do that as well per these OMB instructions. So don’t let that be a factor that holds you back.

Comments must be submitted by July 13th, so that still gives everyone a month to think this through and put forward a solid set of concerns.

Space Quote: Some Question Lack of Female Astronaut on Artemis III Crew

Posted on by onespaceman2000

“The office gets what it needs when it needs it, and we’ll certainly have all these other people that you mentioned, you know, female military test pilots or just other female astronauts, that’ll be picking up on the follow-on Artemis missions.”

-Statement by Artemis III mission commander Randy Bresnik, as quoted by CBS News. He was noting NASA’s diversity of personnel that is ready for the various missions after some criticized NASA for not having a female astronaut among the Artemis III crew. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman also noted his work with women throughout his career, adding in the same news story that:

The last astronaut candidate class selected under this administration was majority female [six women and four men] because they were the best of the best, including one astronaut [Anna Menon] I previously went to space with.

Note: It is worth mentioning that in March 2025 NASA eliminated from its webpage its earlier pledge to land the “the first woman, first person of color” on the lunar service as part of Artemis III mission. The removal was said to be related to an anti-DEI Executive Order. Of course, we are now dealing with a different Artemis III, with the Artemis IV mission now scheduled to be the first to land a crew on the Moon.

Artemis III Has a Crew

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): The Artemis III crew members (from left: Andre Douglas, Luca Parmitano, Randy Bresnik, Frank Rubio). (NASA/Bill Stafford)

Earlier today NASA announced its new four-member crew for the next set of Artemis tests. The two week long Artemis III mission will test spacecraft in low Earth orbit in preparation for Artemis IV, which will entail an actual crewed mission to the surface of the Moon.

The new crew are three NASA astronauts and one European Space Agency (ESA) astronaut from Italy. NASA has a full profile of each crew member, but here are the basics:

NASA may have a crew, but does it have any partners that are really ready for a lunar landing?

To date, the only fully operational spacecraft is the Orion capsule, which will be sent aloft via the Space Launch System. Both SpaceX and Blue Origin plan to send up demonstration lunar landers that will not contain all of the necessary components for humans preparing for a Moon landing. This sounds a little dangerous given that the real reason for Artemis III is a dry-run in space. It sounds more like a dry-run for a dry-run, but NASA may not have time to complete a true test.

In additon to lunar lander delays, SpaceX is busy trying to make a fortune with its IPO, while Blue Origin is still licking its wounds after the recent explosion at Cape Canaveral.

These four astronauts may be the best news out of NASA for some time to come, so it may be best to raise a toast to the four of them and then simply hope for the best.

Space Stories: Nancy Roman Ahead of Schedule, ISS Leak Still a Problem, and US Grant Process Worries Space Scientists

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): Artist’s rendering of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope. (NASA)

Here are some recent space-related stories.

—Techspot: “NASA’s Roman Space Telescope is Launching August 30, Eight Months Ahead of Schedule“

NASA is planning to launch its Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope on August 30, a full eight months ahead of schedule and even earlier than the space agency’s previous target of September. Engineers at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, are in the process of packing the telescope for its journey to Kennedy Space Center in Florida later this month. Upon arrival, it’ll go to the Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility to undergo a full post-travel inspection.

—Space News: “Astronauts Briefly Shelter in Dragon During ISS Leak Repair“

NASA instructed astronauts on the International Space Station to briefly shelter in a Dragon spacecraft June 5 as cosmonauts attempted to repair an air leak in a Russian module. Shortly after 9 a.m. Eastern, NASA Mission Control in Houston instructed the four members of Crew-12, the Crew Dragon mission that has been at the station since February, to shelter in that spacecraft. Joining them was NASA astronaut Chris Williams, who flew to the ISS last November on a Soyuz spacecraft.The move was prompted by a decision by Roscosmos to have cosmonauts Sergey Kud-Sverchkov and Sergei Mikaev attempt to repair an air leak in a portion of the Zvezda service module known as PrK. That is a vestibule that links a docking port with the rest of the module and has had a long-running, but small, air leak.

—Sky & Telescope: “Proposed U.S. Grant Funding Rules Spark Worry, Backlash in Astronomy“

On Friday, May 29th, the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released a 412-page document rewriting how federal grants should be issued and overseen across all agencies. The changes to the procedures, which were previously altered in 2024 to make the grants process clearer, were sweeping, touching on areas from international collaboration to academic publication costs. But the through line is made explicit: to align federal grant-making with “administration policies and priorities set by the President.” Immediately, it has sparked backlash from astronomers and planetary scientists, who see grave challenges for science if the rules come to fruition.

Note: Here is the podcast version of this post.

Space Quote: One Less Sentry Watching Mars

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): Artist’s rendering of the MAVEN spacecraft orbiting Mars. (NASA/Goddard/University of Colorado/Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics)

“The MAVEN mission has truly advanced our understanding of the Martian atmosphere and evolution. This dataset has had a tremendous impact on the field…Our science team is exceptionally proud of all of these amazing discoveries.”

–Comment by Shannon Curry, MAVEN’s principal investigator and a researcher at the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado Boulder, regarding the official end of the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution’s (MAVEN) 11-year mission. NASA lost contact with the spacecraft last December. You can read more about MAVEN’s accomplishments over the years at this NASA site.