A Day in Astronomy: The Death of Eugène Michel Antoniadi

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Image (Credit): E.M. Antoniadi’s 1930 book La Planete Mars. (Linda Hall Library)

On this day in 1944, Greek-French astronomer Eugène Michel Antoniadi passed away in Paris, France.

Mr. Antoniadi was one of the astronomers that battled the idea of a civilization creating canals on the surface of Mars, putting him at odds with American astronomer Percival Lowell. While he was initially open to the idea, he later believed the canals to be an optical illusion.

You can learn much more about the Martian controversy in David Baron’s book The Martians: The True Story of an Alien Craze that Captured Turn-of-the-Century America. You can also hear an interview with the author on the Planetary Society’s Planetary Radio podcast.

Credit: Liveright Publishing

Podcast: We Need To Talk About AI

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Credit: Image by Brian Penny from Pixabay.

The recent Cool Worlds Podcast is basically a rambling talk about the use of AI in the scientific community. Titled “We Need To Talk About AI,” this dialogue by Professor David Kipping follows his visit to the Institute of Advanced Study at Princeton where he heard about how his colleagues are using AI in their work.

Professor Kipping covers many points and makes it clear from the start that he has some serious questions about the impact of AI on his own work and the work of graduate students. For instance, he asks:

  • Will cheap AI change the science community’s need need for graduate students in the future given the time and cost to develop those new scientists compared to the amazing advances in AI?
  • Will the cheap AI program of today become more costly down the road once the AI companies need to recoup the billions of dollars invested in this technology?
  • Will science become too dependent on this technology while human skills atrophy?

He is also very honest about how he uses AI in the production of his own public videos explaining scientific developments and controversies. More interestingly, he wonders aloud whether we will even need his videos in the future as AI gets better and we have the ability to seek our own answers rather than waiting for the next video.

It’s a lot to digest and worth your time, if only because it is an ongoing set of questions in basically every industry at this point.

Listen for yourself and consider giving your own input back to Professor Kipping. He is soliciting your opinion as he finds his way forward in this new world.

Podcast: Does the Younger Generation Even Care about Returning to the Moon?

Posted on by onespaceman2000

In a recent episode of What Next: TBD, titled “Are We Over the Moon?,” the host spoke with Joel Achenbach, freelance journalist and author of an article in Slate called Moondoggle about the upcoming Artemis missions.

The discussion covers the plans for multiple missions to the Moon, the difference in generational interest, and the confusion last year about NASA’s leadership and budget that only brings up more questions.

Overall, Mr. Achenback does not believe the younger generations have much interest in a mission to the Moon. This is a scary statement at a time that NASA is fighting to remain funded and relevant.

It is a podcast (and article) with lessons for NASA’s public relations team, assuming anyone over there is interested.

Podcast: A Discussion with the Creator of Andor

Posted on by onespaceman2000

You are in for a treat if you are interested in a deeper dive into the world of Andor. Reason magazine’s podcast The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie has a eye-opening interview with Tony Gilroy, the creator, writer, and director of Andor. The series is without doubt the best of the Star Wars television series. The podcast discussion covers bureaucracy and the surveillance state as portrayed throughout the Andor series.

One of the questions discussed the lack of light sabers and the Force in the series, to which Mr. Gilroy noted:

One of my original questions to them, to the experts there, was, “In the galaxy—in this huge galaxy—how many people would have ever encountered a Jedi? How many people would ever know about the Force? How many people know about this family you keep rotating these movies on?” And the answer is: nobody, or almost nobody. If you’re living in the galaxy, if you’re a being in the galaxy, you’ve probably never had any encounter ever with Jedi or even know what it is, or the Force.

This type of thinking was made the series worth watching. The series did not need to be saved by Darth Vader or a Yoda plush toy anymore than a good Star Trek series should need to be saved by the Borg.

Andor also touches on something real happening just outside our windows rather than a galaxy far, far away. Mr. Gilroy notes it in this way:

The parallels to what’s happening in our world right now are even beyond moralistic…There is a giddy rush—you’ll see people cravenly move toward power because it’s gonna benefit them, or it’s warmer there, or they have no spine or moral commitment to really back up…People getting on board something—getting on board a train that’s on fire that they know is heading toward a cliff. It’s just amazing to watch the sort of giddy rush of people stripping off their clothes and jumping onto the fire here. It’s quite amazing.

Andor is the antithesis of getting along. It is about pushing back at the cost of everything so that others may someday have something worth holding. It is something we seem to have forgotten in our current situation even though we know the broken norms will not somehow reassert themselves via some outside Force. If we cannot see that we are the Force, then we are all truly lost.

Andor is possibly the one series that makes Star Wars relevant to a new generation. Gen Z does not need Jawas and Ewoks. It needs a new hope.

Mr. Gilroy understands this and shares all of his insights via the podcast. You will not be disappointed.

Really?: Star Trek Author Tied to Jeffrey Epstein Emails

Posted on by onespaceman2000
Credit: Basic Books

This is really getting ridiculous. With the reopening of the federal government, the public has moved onto a new topic, and once again it is sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his emails. However, this time it touches upon an popular cosmologist who wrote a book about Star Trek.

According to recent news stories, cosmologist Lawrence Krauss, author of The Physics of Star Trek, wrote to Mr. Epstein back in 2018 asking for ways to handle sexual harassment complaints against him. Mr. Epstein was a financial supporter of a program run by Dr. Krauss at Arizona State University (ASU). That same year, Dr. Krauss announced his retirement as professor at ASU while dealing with such charges. Dr. Krauss was also a contributor to Scientific American magazine and sat on Scientific American’s board of advisers, but was removed from the board in 2018 for reasons related to allegations of sexual misconduct.

As has been reported endlessly, Mr. Epstein engaged with a very large group of individuals, so Dr. Krauss is not alone. Still, it is not something you want on your resume.

You can still find Dr. Krauss sharing ideas on his podcast, The Origins Podcast with Lawrence Krauss, as well as his substack, Critical Mass. Whether this Epstein topic comes up on either the podcast or substack is anyone’s guess.

Dr. Krauss once stated:

For, after all, in science one achieves the greatest impact (and often the greatest headlines) not by going along with the herd, but by bucking against it.

I don’t believe he was talking about these latest headlines.